resurrexit's profile

Info

profile photo
Name: Jason C.
Joined: March 26, 2008

Contributions

MeFi: 14 posts , 1353 comments
MetaTalk: 0 posts , 3 comments
Ask MeFi: 5 questions , 503 answers
Music: 0 posts , 0 comments, 0 playlists
Music Talk: 0 posts, 0 comments
Projects: 0 posts, 1 comment, 0 votes
Jobs: 0 posts
IRL: 0 posts, 0 comments
FanFare: 0 posts, 0 comments
FanFare Talk: 0 posts, 0 comments

View all activity

Favorites: 1026
Favorited by others: 4382

I help fund MetaFilter!

Social

Links to: 11 users
Linked by: 11 users
MeFi tags: maritime (2) ship (2) chant (1) catholic (1) books (1) blackfriday (1) bigtex (1) benedictine (1) baseball (1) barroux (1)
Ask MeFi tags: fly (1) fan (1) exhaust (1) estate (1) database (1) cite (1) citation (1) children (1) case (1) attic (1)

About

What's the deal with your nickname? How did you get it? If your nickname is self-explanatory, then tell everyone when you first started using the internet, and what was the first thing that made you say "wow, this isn't just a place for freaks after all?" Was it a website? Was it an email from a long-lost friend? Go on, spill it.

Longtime lurker, glad to have an account now.
------------
[A] person who practices the virtue of solidarity (a) Always shapes self-interested actions so as to eliminate or effectively minimize any harm to others; (b) Often chooses to shape self-interested actions so that they actually help others as well; and (c) Sometimes performs actions for the good of others that do not serve personal self-interest at all.
Jeff Mirus.
------------
You prosecute the man or woman
Who steals the goose from off the common,
But leave the larger felon loose
Who steals the common from the goose.
(English rhyme; variants)
------------
"[G]rimy undergraduates and grammar school children are always chanting it like sorcerers!"
------------
"Behind every desire is another one
Waiting to be liberated
When the first one's sated."*
------------
You must show that a man is wrong before you start explaining why he is wrong. The modern method is to assume without discussion that he is wrong and then distract his attention from this (the only real issue) by busily explaining how he became so silly. In the course of the last fifteen years I have found this vice so common that I have had to invent a name for it. I call it “Bulverism.” Some day I am going to write the biography of its imaginary inventor, Ezekiel Bulver, whose destiny was determined at the age of five when he heard his mother say to his father—who had been maintaining that two sides of a triangle were together greater than a third—“Oh you say that because you are a man.” “At that moment,” E. Bulver assures us, “there flashed across my opening mind the great truth that refutation is no necessary part of argument. Assume that your opponent is wrong, and explain his error, and the world will be at your feet. Attempt to prove that he is wrong or (worse still) try to find out whether he is wrong or right, and the national dynamism of our age will thrust you to the wall.” That is how Bulver became one of the makers of the Twentieth Century.
C.S. Lewis, “‘Bulverism’: Or, the Foundation of 20th Century Thought.”